UX for Data visualization and research professionals

Building a public data platform for audience of 3 expertise levels

Client

The Khalifa Ihler Institute

Team

1 Strategy Lead (🙋‍♂️)

1 Design Lead

1 Project manager

Expertise

UX Research

UI Prototyping

Data Visualisation

Timeline

4 months

Team

1 Strategy Lead (🙋‍♂️)`

1 Design Lead

1 Project manager

Designed on Figma, Brought to life with ✨Figma Make✨

TL;DR

I led UX strategy for a complex public data platform

Research, IA, and end-to-end concept design

The problem is conflicting needs

Three user types (casual visitors, researchers, community advocates) with conflicting information needs on one platform.

I solved it with layered Information Architecture

Each user type gets their own section while sharing a coherent visual and navigational language.

My re-design was key for funding

5-page proof of concept and research-backed strategy validated by 6 user interviews and competitive analysis of 5 platforms.

The problem

We had to present complex data to casual users, expert researchers, and the communities represented in the data

We collaborated with Bjørn Ihler, co-founder of the Khalifa Ihler Institute, on Hatemap.io, a public data platform that tracks and visualizes hate crimes worldwide through interactive maps and dynamic data displays. Bjørn wanted to build a space that educates casual users, provides necessary data to professionals, and enables collaboration among affected communities. But those requirements clash with each other.

The original site wasn't catering to either target users…

🙎‍♂️ Casual Users

"I want quick and simple data to know what's going on around the world"

"I want quick and simple data to know what's going on around the world"

🕵️‍♂️ Researchers

"I want a lot of tools and details to dig around and find patterns in the data"

"I want a lot of tools and details to dig around and find patterns in the data"

👥 Community

"I need resources to find help and community"

"I need resources to find help and community"

Research

Research kept returning to the same tension: casual visitors need a story, researchers need the data behind it.

Credible platforms lead with narrative, not data

Competitive analysis revealed that credible data platforms lead with narrative.

Strong headers, quick-scan stats, and clear CTAs (not raw data dumps).

Even experts enter through the story first

User interviews (with PhDs and researchers) confirmed both… experts need raw data and export tools, but they still enter through the narrative layer first.

Trust hinges on transparency

Affinity mapping surfaced that trust in sensitive data hinges on transparency: cited sources, tagged gaps, and visible methodology.

3 weeks of iterative strategy and implementation

Skeleton wireframes first, then three rounds of iteration, testing whether the layered structure actually served both audiences at once.

Site map defining the 5 core sections, built to support both quick exploration and deep research without switching contexts.

Credible platforms lead with narrative, not data

Competitive analysis revealed that credible data platforms lead with narrative.

Strong headers, quick-scan stats, and clear CTAs (not raw data dumps).

Trust hinges on transparency

Affinity mapping surfaced that trust in sensitive data hinges on transparency: cited sources, tagged gaps, and visible methodology.

Even experts enter through the story first

User interviews (with PhDs and researchers) confirmed both… experts need raw data and export tools, but they still enter through the narrative layer first.

3 weeks of iterative strategy and implementation

Skeleton wireframes first, then three rounds of iteration, testing whether the layered structure actually served both audiences at once.

Site map defining the 5 core sections, built to support both quick exploration and deep research without switching contexts.

Credible platforms lead with narrative, not data

Competitive analysis revealed that credible data platforms lead with narrative.

Strong headers, quick-scan stats, and clear CTAs (not raw data dumps).

Even experts enter through the story first

User interviews (with PhDs and researchers) confirmed both… experts need raw data and export tools, but they still enter through the narrative layer first.

Trust hinges on transparency

Affinity mapping surfaced that trust in sensitive data hinges on transparency: cited sources, tagged gaps, and visible methodology.

3 weeks of iterative strategy and implementation

Skeleton wireframes first, then three rounds of iteration, testing whether the layered structure actually served both audiences at once.

Site map defining the 5 core sections, built to support both quick exploration and deep research without switching contexts.

Solution

The result is a multi-layered data visualization, and space for tools and resources

The goal of this project was to strike a balance between simplicity, exploration, and community.

Quick information -> Click -> Detailed information

🙎‍♂️🕵️‍♂️👥 Built for all user types

The data visualization is designed with a gradual reveal of detailed information, so that those who are curious can explore, while the rest can leave with the information they need.

Bite-sized information

🕵️‍♂️ Built for Casual users

Researchers want to dig around and play with data - make comparisons and connect dots. The Trend Finder tool helps them do just that.

Data Exploration and literacy tools

🕵️‍♂️ Built for Researchers

Researchers want to dig around and play with data - make comparisons and connect dots. The Trend Finder tool helps them do just that.

Advocacy & Outreach Tools

👥 Built for community members

Articles that tell stories, and resources for those who need, and a discord server built by the founder provide help and companionship to anyone that needs it.

Future scope

Optimisations and implementations down the lane.

While our timeframe was short, we thought farther into the future of Hatemap.io, in order to optimize it for users with different needs and circumstances, plans to make the implementation of this design more effective, and expanding on our product without roadblocks.

Mobile-first design for a global a global accessibility (not everyone has computers)

While researchers tend to work on desktop, community advocates and casual users are predominantly mobile. Designing for mobile meant prioritizing quick access to resources and community spaces, not the full data exploration toolkit.

The mobile optimization plan puts more of an emphasis on the community spaces and resources, so users can find help or connect with communities efficiently.

A research-backed prototype used to pitch for implementation funding

Bjorn took the prototype to funding conversations as a proof of concept for what Hatemap.io could become. The original site has since gone offline, the redesign hasn't been implemented yet, and funding is still pending.

But that's the reality of early-stage design work. Timelines don't always match the pace of implementation.

Meet the team (after we wrapped up our hand over)

Check out our blogpost to dive deeper!